Delete Scaleway bucket website configuration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). The description adds that the website endpoint stops serving, which is a useful behavioral consequence. However, it does not disclose prerequisites (e.g., bucket must exist), idempotency implications, or error conditions, partially compensating for annotation gaps but leaving some transparency missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of 12 words. It efficiently states the action ('Remove the static-website configuration') and the effect ('the website endpoint stops serving') with no redundant or unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter deletion tool without an output schema, the description covers the primary purpose and consequence. However, it omits details about reversibility, error responses (e.g., if the configuration doesn't exist), and relationship to other S3 configuration operations. It is adequate but not fully complete for an agent to handle edge cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: both 'bucket' and 'region' have descriptions in the input schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter guidance beyond what the schema already provides, meeting the baseline but offering no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description both use 'Delete' and 'Remove the static-website configuration', clearly specifying the action and resource. The effect 'the website endpoint stops serving' adds concrete context, distinguishing it from sibling tools like scaleway_s3_get_bucket_website and scaleway_s3_put_bucket_website.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for removing static website configuration, but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternative tools such as scaleway_s3_put_bucket_website (to set) or scaleway_s3_get_bucket_website (to inspect). No exclusion criteria or when-not-to-use advice is provided, so the agent must infer from context alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.