Delete Scaleway Bucket Policy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly mentions the destructive behavior ('Removes ALL grants... loses access immediately') and the 'confirm' requirement, which adds value beyond the annotations' destructiveHint: true and the schema's const: true for confirm. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that are front-loaded with the core action, then the key requirement and consequence. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature, the description covers the core behavior and confirm requirement. Without an output schema, it could optionally mention the successful response or error states, but the close fit with annotations makes it nearly complete for an experienced user.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 3. The description adds no param details beyond the schema, but the warning about access loss reinforces the confirm parameter's gravity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove' and resource 'bucket's Bucket Policy', and distinguishes it from sibling tools like scaleway_s3_put_bucket_policy and scaleway_s3_get_bucket_policy, which are about setting or getting the policy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the need for 'confirm=true' and warns about immediate loss of access, giving context for when to use it, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare it against alternatives like nullifying the policy via put_bucket_policy.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.