list_pipelines
List all pipelines with optional status filter, ordered by creation time descending.
Instructions
列出所有 Pipeline。支持按状态筛选,按创建时间倒序排列。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | 最大返回数量 | |
| status | No | 状态筛选 | all |
List all pipelines with optional status filter, ordered by creation time descending.
列出所有 Pipeline。支持按状态筛选,按创建时间倒序排列。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | 最大返回数量 | |
| status | No | 状态筛选 | all |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description lacks behavioral details such as whether it is read-only, pagination behavior, or response format. Only filtering and sorting are mentioned.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with no wasted words. Could be slightly more structured but remains efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing information about response structure (e.g., what fields returned), pagination details, or additional filters. Adequate for a simple listing tool but not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by stating 'sorted by creation time in descending order', which is not in the schema. However, parameter descriptions are minimal.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists all pipelines and supports filtering by status with descending creation order. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like get_pipeline.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_pipeline or search tools. The description only states what it does.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/liuboacean/agent-comm-hub'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server