Unraid API owner

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the 'connected' scope, which is a small behavioral constraint, but it doesn't disclose what happens if no account is connected or what the returned profile contains. Given the strong annotation coverage, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded, unambiguous sentence with no wasted words. It communicates the core function efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read query with annotations covering safety, the description is mostly sufficient. However, the sibling unraid_v4371_query_me creates ambiguity about what 'owner' means versus 'me,' and the description does not clarify the distinction or any expected output. This leaves a meaningful completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to explain beyond the schema. The baseline of 4 applies here because no parameter documentation is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Get the connected Unraid account profile.' This clearly describes what the tool does using active language. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool unraid_v4371_query_me, which could plausibly retrieve the same information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling query tools. It does not state exclusions, conditions, or alternatives, leaving the agent to guess the distinguishing use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.