Unraid API logFile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is established. The phrase 'bounded section' adds useful behavioral context about limiting reads, but the description does not mention response format, path validity behavior, or any other operational details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no redundant wording. It is efficient, though extremely terse; brevity is a strength, but it borders on under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with three parameters, no output schema, and no parameter descriptions, the description leaves significant gaps: how bounds are expressed, what content is returned, and how this differs from unraid_read_system_log or unraid_query_log_files. An agent can guess, but the definition does not fully support correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the roles of path, lines, or startLine. The phrase 'bounded section' weakly hints at line-based reading, but the agent is left to infer which parameters define the bounds and how they interact.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Read'), a clear resource ('server log file'), and a scope ('bounded section'), so an agent understands the core function. It does not explicitly differentiate from log-related siblings such as unraid_read_system_log or unraid_query_log_files, but the action and object are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like unraid_read_system_log or unraid_get_docker_logs. The description gives no context about which log file types it applies to or what distinguishes it from the many log-related sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.