Unraid API connect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds modest context by mentioning 'safe settings values' and 'without form schemas,' but it does not disclose return shape, error behavior, or what 'safe settings' excludes. This is adequate given the strong annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no filler. The main action and resource are front-loaded, and every word contributes to understanding what the tool does.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only query with rich annotations, the description provides enough scope to know what will be returned: Unraid Connect status and safe settings values. It could be more precise about what 'safe settings values' includes, but no required invocation details are missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema places no burden on the description. The description does not need to explain parameter behavior because none exist, making this a solid baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and names a concrete resource ('Unraid Connect status and safe settings values'), making the tool's purpose clear. It does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools, but the 'without form schemas' phrasing hints at a distinction from form-schema-related queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling query tools such as unraid_v4371_query_settings or unraid_v4371_query_config. The description implies a read-only status query, but it does not state when this specific tool is the right choice or when an alternative should be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.