Skip to main content
Glama
LazyVerilog MCP

LazyVerilog MCP

Official
by lazyverilog

Related Servers

Alternatives to LazyVerilog MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to lint, compile, syntax-check, and simulate Verilog/SystemVerilog designs through structured, token-efficient MCP tools with isolated containerized toolchains.
      4
      11 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to synthesize Verilog/SystemVerilog designs with Yosys, inspect cell hierarchies and gate counts, and detect synthesis hazards like inferred latches and combinational loops before physical design flows.
      4
      8 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local AI coding assistants to operate remote Linux EDA clusters over persistent SSH/SCP for digital IC design, simulation, formal property verification, UVM testbench generation, static linting, and Git-backed workspace synchronization.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to perform AST-backed semantic Verilog/SystemVerilog code reviews, catching race conditions, reset polarity mismatches, and bitwidth truncations while computing a 0–100 RTL quality score.
      4
      13 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with compiler-backed, read-only context for Verilog and SystemVerilog projects using pyslang.
      39 PyPI
      21
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to drive a locally installed Xilinx Vivado through 32 curated tools covering sessions, synthesis, implementation, timing and CDC reports, XDC, IP, waveforms, and device programming. It also provides structured timing evidence with baseline comparison, offline VCD queries, environment self-diagnostics, and evidence-driven workflow prompts.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct LSP-style operation: navigation, symbol search, hierarchy, linting, formatting, and code actions. The paired tools are clearly differentiated, such as code_actions vs apply_code_action and lint vs lint_all.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lower_snake_case and are descriptive, but conventions are mixed between verb-led actions (rename_symbol, find_references) and noun-led introspection tools (workspace_symbols, document_symbols). The pattern is still readable and mostly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal range for an HDL/LSP-style server. Each tool covers a meaningful capability without obvious padding or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core code intelligence: symbols, navigation, references, rename, code actions, hierarchy, linting, and formatting. Minor gaps remain around completion, signature help, and advanced hierarchy/implementation queries, but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues