Remove Pages from Label

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (destructiveHint: true, idempotentHint: true) already indicate the tool modifies state but is idempotent. The description does not add any additional behavioral context beyond what annotations convey, such as clarifying that pages are only unassigned from the label, not deleted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence) with no redundant information. However, it could be slightly more informative without becoming verbose, hence a 4 rather than 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no output schema, the description should clarify what the operation actually does (e.g., pages are unassigned but not deleted). It fails to provide this context, making it less complete for an agent to fully understand the tool's effect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the two parameters (labelId, pageIds). The description adds no further meaning or usage details about these parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remove pages from a label' clearly states the action (remove) and resource (pages from a label). It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like label_remove_documents or label_remove_all_pages, though it does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to remove specific pages versus all pages. No prerequisites or contextual cues are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.