Get Profile
lexware_get_profileRetrieve your organization's profile information from Lexware Office to access business details.
Instructions
Get the organization profile information.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
lexware_get_profileRetrieve your organization's profile information from Lexware Office to access business details.
Get the organization profile information.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate a safe, read-only, idempotent operation. The description adds the context of fetching 'organization profile information' but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits such as caching, latency, or data completeness.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundancy. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's function.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the description is adequate for a simple read-only tool with no parameters and no output schema, it lacks detail about the returned data. Users are left to infer what 'profile information' includes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. Per the guidelines, a baseline of 4 is appropriate since no parameter documentation is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'organization profile information', making the purpose explicit. It distinguishes from sibling tools that retrieve other entities (e.g., get_article, get_contact) but doesn't elaborate on what the profile contains.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical scenarios, or which tool to choose for profile-related tasks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lazyants/lexware-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server