Perplexity MCP Server
This Perplexity MCP Server is a Node.js implementation of Anthropic's Model Context Protocol that enables Claude to interact with Perplexity AI's language models through two main tools:
perplexity_chat: Generate advanced chat completions with full message history support, temperature control, and access to models like
mixtral-8x7b-instruct,codellama-34b-instruct,sonar-small-chat, andsonar-small-online.perplexity_ask: Send simple, single-query requests to models including
llama-3.1-sonar-small-128k-online,llama-3.1-sonar-large-128k-online, andllama-3.1-sonar-huge-128k-online.
The server is type-safe, modular, secure, and can be integrated with Claude Desktop through configuration.
Enables interaction with Perplexity AI's language models, providing capabilities to generate chat completions with full message history support and send simple queries for quick answers using various Llama-based models.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Perplexity MCP Serverexplain quantum computing in simple terms"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Perplexity MCP Server
Overview
The Perplexity MCP Server is a Node.js implementation of Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) that enables Claude to interact with Perplexity's language models. This server provides a secure bridge between Claude and Perplexity AI's capabilities, allowing for enhanced AI interactions through tool use.
Related MCP server: Perplexity MCP Server
Available Tools
The server currently implements two main tools:
1. perplexity_chat
Advanced chat completion tool with full message history support.
{
"name": "perplexity_chat",
"description": "Generate a chat completion using Perplexity AI",
"parameters": {
"model": "string (optional) - One of: llama-3.1-sonar-small-128k-online, llama-3.1-sonar-large-128k-online, llama-3.1-sonar-huge-128k-online",
"messages": "array of {role, content} objects - The conversation history",
"temperature": "number (optional) - Sampling temperature between 0-2"
}
}2. perplexity_ask
Simplified single-query interface for quick questions.
{
"name": "perplexity_ask",
"description": "Send a simple query to Perplexity AI",
"parameters": {
"query": "string - The question or prompt to send",
"model": "string (optional) - One of: llama-3.1-sonar-small-128k-online, llama-3.1-sonar-large-128k-online, llama-3.1-sonar-huge-128k-online"
}
}Installation
Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/perplexity-mcp-server.git cd perplexity-mcp-serverInstall dependencies:
npm installCreate
.envfile:PERPLEXITY_API_KEY=your-api-key-hereBuild the project:
npm run build
Claude Desktop Configuration
To add this server to Claude Desktop, update your claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
//more servers...
"perplexity": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["path\\to\\perplexity-mcp-server\\dist\\index.js"],
"env": {
"PERPLEXITY_API_KEY": "YOUR_PERPLEXITY_API_KEY"
}
}
//more servers...
}
}The configuration file is typically located at:
Windows:
%APPDATA%/Claude/config/claude_desktop_config.jsonmacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/config/claude_desktop_config.jsonLinux:
~/.config/Claude/config/claude_desktop_config.json
Development
Start the development server with automatic recompilation:
npm run devThe server uses TypeScript and implements the MCP protocol using the @modelcontextprotocol/sdk package.
Architecture
Core Components
PerplexityServer Class
Implements MCP server protocol
Handles tool registration and execution
Manages error handling and server lifecycle
Tools System
Modular tool definitions
Type-safe tool handlers
Structured input validation
Technical Details
Built with TypeScript for type safety
Uses
@modelcontextprotocol/sdkfor MCP implementationCommunicates via stdio transport
Environment-based configuration
Error Handling
The server implements comprehensive error handling:
API error reporting
Invalid tool requests handling
Connection error management
Process signal handling
Dependencies
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk: ^1.0.3dotenv: ^16.4.7isomorphic-fetch: ^3.0.0
Contributing
Fork the repository
Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature')Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Open a Pull Request
Security
API keys are managed through environment variables
Input validation for all tool parameters
Error messages are sanitized before output
Process isolation through MCP protocol
License
This project is licensed under the ISC License.
Troubleshooting
Common issues and solutions:
Server Not Found
Verify the path in
claude_desktop_config.jsonis correctEnsure the server is built (
npm run build)Check if Node.js is in your PATH
Authentication Errors
Verify your Perplexity API key in .env
Check if the API key has the required permissions
Tool Execution Errors
Verify the tool parameters match the schema
Check network connectivity
Review server logs for detailed error messages
Available Tools
2 toolsperplexity_askB
Send a simple query to Perplexity AI
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | No | The model to use for completion | |
| query | Yes | The question or prompt to send |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations and a minimal description, the tool's behavior is opaque. It does not disclose whether the query is synchronous, what response format to expect, or any safety/reliability traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single clear sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose. It is appropriately front-loaded and concise, though it could incorporate more detail without becoming wordy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple query tool with no output schema, the description lacks information about the response (e.g., text output, confidence scores). The agent would need to infer or discover the return type from usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters have descriptions. The description adds no extra value beyond the schema, but baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already documents parameters adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Send a simple query') and the target resource ('Perplexity AI'). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'perplexity_chat' by implying this is for a single query, while 'chat' likely involves multi-turn conversation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling 'perplexity_chat'. There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or alternatives, leaving the agent to infer usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
perplexity_chatC
Generate a chat completion using Perplexity AI
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | No | The model to use for completion | |
| messages | Yes | Array of messages in the conversation | |
| temperature | No | Sampling temperature (0-2) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No behavioral traits are disclosed beyond the minimal description. The schema includes a model with 'sonar-small-online' suggesting internet access, but this is not mentioned. With no annotations, the description should provide more context about side effects, permissions, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it is too brief to convey necessary information. It could be expanded without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 3 parameters and a sibling tool, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the role of Perplexity AI, the meaning of different models, or how this tool differs from 'perplexity_ask'. The lack of output schema increases the need for a more complete description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are documented in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: generating a chat completion using Perplexity AI. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'perplexity_ask', which likely performs a similar but distinct function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling tool 'perplexity_ask'. The context hints at a distinction (chat vs. ask), but it is not explicitly stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Both tools involve querying Perplexity AI, with only subtle differences in description ('simple query' vs 'chat completion'). An agent would likely struggle to decide which to use, as the boundaries are unclear.
Both tools follow a consistent 'perplexity_<verb>' pattern. The verbs 'ask' and 'chat' are different but semantically related, and no mixing of naming conventions is present.
With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal for a service like Perplexity AI, which typically offers more nuanced capabilities (e.g., different models, streaming). However, it covers basic query and chat needs.
The tool surface covers basic query and chat interactions but lacks operations such as specifying model parameters, context handling, or result streaming. This may limit agent flexibility.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Persistent context for Claude. Your AI always knows your projects and next actions across sessions.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Connect Claude AI to UluP Spaces via MCP — create projects, nodes, and tasks with OAuth 2.0.
Agent personas for Claude. 16 tools, 13 personas, 3 workflows. Zero extra API cost. Free.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Node.js/TypeScript implementation of a Model Context Protocol server for the Deepseek R1 language model, optimized for reasoning tasks with a large context window and fully integrated with Claude Desktop.169MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA custom Model Context Protocol implementation that integrates Perplexity AI with Claude Desktop, allowing users to access Perplexity's AI models for both single questions and multi-turn conversations.3015ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceInterfaces with the Perplexity AI API to provide advanced question answering capabilities through the standardized Model Context Protocol, supporting multiple Perplexity models.
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Node.js implementation of the Kagi Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude AI to search the web and summarize documents, videos, and audio using Kagi's APIs.218MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/laodev1/perplexity-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server