Deepseek R1 MCP Server
This server enables advanced text generation using the Deepseek R1 or Deepseek V3 language models through the Model Context Protocol. You can:
Generate text with up to 8192 tokens in a single request
Choose between DeepSeek-R1 (deepseek-reasoner) and DeepSeek-V3 (deepseek-chat) models for different tasks
Configure parameters like max_tokens and temperature (0-2) to control output length and creativity
Integrate seamlessly with Claude Desktop
Handle various use cases including coding, data analysis, creative writing and translation
Receive detailed error messages for quick troubleshooting
Use the full MCP protocol for compatibility with other tools
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Deepseek R1 MCP Serverexplain quantum entanglement in simple terms"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Deepseek R1 MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation for the Deepseek R1 language model. Deepseek R1 is a powerful language model optimized for reasoning tasks with a context window of 8192 tokens.
Why Node.js? This implementation uses Node.js/TypeScript as it provides the most stable integration with MCP servers. The Node.js SDK offers better type safety, error handling, and compatibility with Claude Desktop.
Quick Start
Installing manually
# Clone and install
git clone https://github.com/66julienmartin/MCP-server-Deepseek_R1.git
cd deepseek-r1-mcp
npm install
# Set up environment
cp .env.example .env # Then add your API key
# Build and run
npm run buildRelated MCP server: MCP Advanced Reasoning Server
Prerequisites
Node.js (v18 or higher)
npm
Claude Desktop
Deepseek API key
Model Selection
By default, this server uses the deepseek-R1 model. If you want to use DeepSeek-V3 instead, modify the model name in src/index.ts:
// For DeepSeek-R1 (default)
model: "deepseek-reasoner"
// For DeepSeek-V3
model: "deepseek-chat"Project Structure
deepseek-r1-mcp/
├── src/
│ ├── index.ts # Main server implementation
├── build/ # Compiled files
│ ├── index.js
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── package.json
├── package-lock.json
└── tsconfig.jsonConfiguration
Create a
.envfile:
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=your-api-key-hereUpdate Claude Desktop configuration:
{
"mcpServers": {
"deepseek_r1": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/deepseek-r1-mcp/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "your-api-key"
}
}
}
}Development
npm run dev # Watch mode
npm run build # Build for productionFeatures
Advanced text generation with Deepseek R1 (8192 token context window)
Configurable parameters (max_tokens, temperature)
Robust error handling with detailed error messages
Full MCP protocol support
Claude Desktop integration
Support for both DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-V3 models
API Usage
{
"name": "deepseek_r1",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Your prompt here",
"max_tokens": 8192, // Maximum tokens to generate
"temperature": 0.2 // Controls randomness
}
}The Temperature Parameter
The default value of temperature is 0.2.
Deepseek recommends setting the temperature according to your specific use case:
USE CASE | TEMPERATURE | EXAMPLE |
Coding / Math | 0.0 | Code generation, mathematical calculations |
Data Cleaning / Data Analysis | 1.0 | Data processing tasks |
General Conversation | 1.3 | Chat and dialogue |
Translation | 1.3 | Language translation |
Creative Writing / Poetry | 1.5 | Story writing, poetry generation |
Error Handling
The server provides detailed error messages for common issues:
API authentication errors
Invalid parameters
Rate limiting
Network issues
Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request.
License
MIT
Available Tools
1 tooldeepseek_r1C
Generate text using DeepSeek R1 model
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | Input text for DeepSeek | |
| max_tokens | No | Maximum tokens to generate (default: 8192) | |
| temperature | No | Sampling temperature (default: 0.2) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While 'Generate text' implies a read/write operation that creates content, it lacks critical behavioral details such as rate limits, authentication requirements, response format, error conditions, or whether it's idempotent. The description adds minimal value beyond the basic function.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with a single, clear sentence that directly states the tool's purpose. There's no wasted language or unnecessary elaboration, making it efficiently front-loaded and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a text generation tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It doesn't explain what kind of text is generated, typical use cases, limitations, or what the return value looks like. The combination of no annotations and no output schema means the description should provide more contextual information than it does.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, meaning all parameters are well-documented in the schema itself. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's already in the schema, so it meets the baseline expectation but doesn't provide extra semantic context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Generate text') and specifies the resource ('using DeepSeek R1 model'), which provides a specific verb+resource combination. However, since there are no sibling tools mentioned, there's no opportunity to distinguish from alternatives, preventing a perfect score of 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or contextual constraints. It simply states what the tool does without any usage instructions, which is insufficient for effective tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as text generation using the DeepSeek R1 model, leaving no ambiguity for an agent to misselect between multiple options.
A single tool inherently exhibits perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare against. The tool name 'deepseek_r1' follows a clear pattern that matches the server name and describes its function, with no deviations or mixed conventions present.
One tool is too few for a server's apparent scope, as it suggests minimal functionality that might not support complex workflows. While a single tool can be appropriate for very narrow purposes, this server's name implies a broader capability that a single text generation tool does not fully cover, making it feel thin and limited.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the server's implied domain of DeepSeek R1 model interactions. It only offers text generation, lacking obvious gaps such as model configuration, parameter tuning, or other common AI model operations like embeddings or fine-tuning, which could cause agent failures in broader tasks.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
A Model Context Protocol server for Wix AI tools
Hosted MCP server connecting claude.ai, ChatGPT and other AI apps to your own computer
Model Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Control Protocol server implementation that allows Claude Desktop to use Deepseek models running in Docker, enabling seamless integration between Claude Desktop and Deepseek's language models.4MIT
- FlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enhances Claude in Cursor AI with advanced reasoning capabilities including Monte Carlo Tree Search, Beam Search, R1 Transformer, and Hybrid Reasoning methods.813
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that combines DeepSeek R1's reasoning capabilities with Claude 3.5 Sonnet's response generation, enabling two-stage AI processing where DeepSeek's structured reasoning enhances Claude's final outputs.23MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash model, enabling Claude Desktop users to interact with Gemini through natural language conversations.1703MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kamelirzouni/MCP-server-Deepseek_R1'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server