set_item_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description should disclose side effects, permissions, or idempotency, but it only implies a write operation with no further details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, but it redundantly restates parameter definitions already present in the schema, wasting space that could provide additional context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, output schema, or parameter details, the description fails to convey error handling, XML validation expectations, or consequences of setting config incorrectly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description merely echoes parameter names ('fullname', 'config_xml') without adding type constraints, format requirements, or any meaningful semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Set specific item config' and identifies the resource as a Jenkins item, differentiating from sibling tools like get_item_config.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_node_config, nor are there any prerequisites or typical scenarios mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.