get_item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It implies a read-only operation but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions required, or rate limits. The description is too minimal to provide transparency beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point, without unnecessary verbiage. It uses a clear structure with Args and Returns sections. However, it could be slightly more informative without adding length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks details about what an 'item' constitutes, how to construct the 'fullname' (e.g., path format), and what the return object contains. Given the complexity of Jenkins and the presence of many sibling get tools, this is insufficient for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'fullname' with no description. The tool description restates it as 'The fullname of the item', which adds no additional meaning beyond the property name. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get specific item from Jenkins', which clearly indicates the verb (get) and resource (item). It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_all_items' by specifying 'specific item', making it clear that this retrieves one item rather than a list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'get_all_items' for listing or 'get_item_config' for configuration. There is no mention of prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.