get_plugins_with_updates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read operation ('Get'), but does not explicitly declare read-only or destructive behavior. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It lacks details on side effects, permission requirements, or rate limits, but the operation is simple and the output schema provides some clarity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and to the point, with the main purpose stated at the beginning. It includes an Args and Returns section. However, it could benefit from a slightly more structured explanation of the depth parameter's effect.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the output schema exists and covers return values, the description does not differentiate this tool from siblings like get_plugins_with_backup or get_plugins_with_problems. The parameter explanation is vague, and the tool's place in the broader set of plugin-related tools is unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage. The description adds a brief explanation for the 'depth' parameter ('The depth of the information to retrieve'), which is minimal and vague. It adds some value beyond the schema but does not fully compensate for the lack of parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets plugins that have available updates. This verb+resource pair is specific and distinguishes it from siblings like get_all_plugins (all plugins) and get_plugins_with_problems (plugins with problems). The purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_plugin, get_all_plugins, or get_plugins_with_problems. The description does not mention any filters, prerequisites, or context-specific usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.