get_plugins_with_updates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral details. It only states 'Get' implying read-only but does not disclose any authorization needs, side effects, or operational constraints (e.g., whether the check is cached or real-time).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using two sentences plus argument docs. The purpose is front-loaded. However, it is almost too brief; additional context could be added without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While an output schema exists, the description fails to provide sufficient context about the tool's behavior, such as what constitutes 'available updates', filtering, pagination, or performance implications. For a tool with no annotations, this is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the 'depth' parameter as 'the depth of the information to retrieve', adding meaning beyond the schema's type and default. However, it lacks specifics on what different depth values entail, leaving ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'plugins that have available updates', making the purpose unambiguous. However, it does not differentiate this tool from siblings like 'get_all_plugins' or 'get_plugin', missing a chance to clarify scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use 'get_all_plugins' instead. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.