Get a publisher
get_publisherRetrieve a publisher's details by providing its unique identifier.
Instructions
Retrieve one publisher by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| publisher_id | Yes |
get_publisherRetrieve a publisher's details by providing its unique identifier.
Retrieve one publisher by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| publisher_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no behavioral context (e.g., rate limits, return format). It doesn't contradict, but no extra value beyond structured data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficient and front-loaded. Could include more context without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with one parameter and annotations, the description is adequate. It could mention that it returns the publisher object, but it's implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but the parameter name 'publisher_id' is self-explanatory. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'retrieve', resource 'publisher', and identifier 'by id'. It distinguishes from siblings like list_publishers (list all) and update_publisher (modify).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_publishers for multiple publishers) or prerequisites for the id.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/labelgrid/labelgrid-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server