Get a label
get_labelRetrieve a label's settings and defaults by its ID to manage music catalog details.
Instructions
Retrieve one label by id, including its settings and defaults.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| label_id | Yes |
get_labelRetrieve a label's settings and defaults by its ID to manage music catalog details.
Retrieve one label by id, including its settings and defaults.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| label_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true; description adds that it includes settings and defaults, but no further behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy; every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple; description covers retrieval by id and mentions return contents (settings and defaults). No output schema needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but description does not elaborate on the single parameter 'label_id' beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'Retrieve' and resource 'label by id', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like 'list_labels'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'list_labels' for listing multiple labels.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/labelgrid/labelgrid-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server