Skip to main content
Glama

passkey_register_verify

Verify a browser's WebAuthn registration response and store the user's passkey for future authentication.

Instructions

Verify a browser WebAuthn registration response and store the user's passkey.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
labelNoOptional passkey label
responseNoPublicKeyCredential registration response JSON from the browser
project_idYesThe project ID
access_tokenYesAuthenticated user's access_token
challenge_idYeschallenge_id returned by passkey_register_options
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool stores the passkey (write operation), but doesn't elaborate on side effects like permanent storage or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded, no wasted words. Could benefit from a second sentence for context, but still concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema or annotations, and 5 parameters. The minimal description leaves out necessary context like the flow from passkey_register_options and the expected format of the response parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'verify' and 'store' and the resources 'browser WebAuthn registration response' and 'user's passkey', distinguishing it from siblings like passkey_register_options and passkey_login_verify.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention the prerequisite call to passkey_register_options or that it follows the browser registration step.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kychee-com/run402-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server