list_subdomains
Retrieve all subdomains claimed by a project to review and manage domain assignments.
Instructions
List all subdomains claimed by a project.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | The project ID |
Retrieve all subdomains claimed by a project to review and manage domain assignments.
List all subdomains claimed by a project.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | The project ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
While the description indicates a safe read operation, it lacks details on pagination, limits, or what 'claimed' means relative to sibling tools. No annotations are provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words, making it easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description omits what the response contains (list of strings? objects?), and lacks context on how this tool relates to claim_subdomain and delete_subdomain.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter (project_id) has full schema coverage, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'The project ID'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list), resource (subdomains), and scope (claimed by a project), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_custom_domains.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_custom_domains or claim_subdomain, and no exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kychee-com/run402-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server