create_email_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses idempotency and email sending. With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It doesn't mention failure modes (invalid email, Stripe issues) or confirm that creation is non-destructive. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose and constraints, second adds behavioral traits. No redundant words, front-loads key info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, idempotency, email verification. Lacks response format, error handling, and whether operation is synchronous. Adequate for a simple creation tool but missing typical context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'email' with schema description already covering constraints. The tool description restates 'Stripe-only, no wallet' but does not add new parameter-related meaning beyond the schema. With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'email-based organization'. Adds constraints 'Stripe-only, no wallet required', which helps distinguish from wallet-based org creation. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tool 'create_org', which may be more general.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context that it sends a verification email and is idempotent. Implies usage for email-based, Stripe-only organizations, but no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives like 'create_org' or 'link_wallet_to_organization'. No when-not-to-use statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.