Remove Node Module
node-red-nodes-remove-moduleRemove a node module from Node-RED by specifying its module name.
Instructions
Remove a node module from Node-RED
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| module | Yes |
node-red-nodes-remove-moduleRemove a node module from Node-RED by specifying its module name.
Remove a node module from Node-RED
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| module | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the obvious destructive action. It omits details like whether removal requires a restart, whether it affects runtime, or if it can be undone.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, but it is too terse. While concise, it sacrifices necessary detail, making it less effective than a slightly longer but more informative version.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain what happens upon success, error conditions, or side effects, leaving the agent with ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description provides no additional meaning for the 'module' parameter. It merely restates the parameter name without clarifying format, constraints, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Remove' and resource 'node module', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like 'install', 'get', or 'toggle'. It unambiguously states the tool's action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. For instance, it does not mention when to prefer 'remove' over 'toggle-module' for disabling. Lacks context about prerequisites or consequences.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kskwon02/node-red-ai-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server