Get Flow
node-red-flows-getRetrieve a specific Node-RED flow tab using its ID or label.
Instructions
Get a single flow tab by id or label
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| idOrLabel | Yes |
node-red-flows-getRetrieve a specific Node-RED flow tab using its ID or label.
Get a single flow tab by id or label
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| idOrLabel | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Minimal description but for a simple get operation it's adequate. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden; it doesn't disclose error behavior or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence with no unnecessary words, well front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no parameter descriptions, the tool description lacks completeness on return values, error handling, and prerequisite conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and description adds no extra meaning beyond property name 'idOrLabel'. It fails to clarify expected format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it gets a single flow tab by id or label, distinguishing from list and modification tools. However, it doesn't specify if it returns the flow data or just metadata.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use versus sibling tools like node-red-flows-list, nor any prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kskwon02/node-red-ai-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server