List Nodes
node-red-nodes-listList installed node modules and node sets in your Node-RED environment.
Instructions
List installed node modules and node sets in Node-RED
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
node-red-nodes-listList installed node modules and node sets in your Node-RED environment.
List installed node modules and node sets in Node-RED
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states the action without mentioning whether it is read-only, requires authentication, or side effects. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is highly concise and immediately states the tool's function with no wasteful phrasing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter listing tool, description is functional. It explains what is listed but does not hint at output format; no output schema exists to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline score of 3 applies as description adds no param-level detail beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('List') and the resource ('installed node modules and node sets') within Node-RED, making it distinct from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get-module or get-set, or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kskwon02/node-red-ai-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server