get-permission
Retrieve permissions for a specific user within a given virtual host on RabbitMQ.
Instructions
Get permissions for a user in a vhost.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vhost | Yes | ||
| user | Yes |
Retrieve permissions for a specific user within a given virtual host on RabbitMQ.
Get permissions for a user in a vhost.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vhost | Yes | ||
| user | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no extra behavioral context. It correctly aligns with the read-only nature but does not elaborate on side effects or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, front-loaded with the core action, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple with 2 required parameters, there is no mention of the return value or output structure. openWorldHint suggests potential extra fields, but the description should note what is returned.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description does not explain the parameters beyond their names (vhost, user). No additional semantics provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get permissions') and the resource ('for a user in a vhost'), specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like list-permissions or set-permission.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list-permissions, get-vhost-permissions). No exclusions or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kmitchell/rabbitmq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server