get-global-parameter
Retrieve a specific global parameter from RabbitMQ by providing its name, enabling inspection of cluster-wide settings.
Instructions
Get a specific global parameter.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Retrieve a specific global parameter from RabbitMQ by providing its name, enabling inspection of cluster-wide settings.
Get a specific global parameter.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the tool is clearly a safe read operation. The description adds no additional behavioral details beyond 'Get', but does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (6 words) and front-loaded with the key action and resource. It earns its place by being succinct, though it could include more context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description lacks details on return values, error states, or prerequisites. It is minimally adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only implies that a 'name' parameter identifies the parameter without specifying valid values, format, or behavior when not found.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a specific global parameter.' clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (global parameter). It distinguishes from sibling tools like list-global-parameters (multiple items) and delete-global-parameter (modification).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list-global-parameters or delete-global-parameter. The description offers no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kmitchell/rabbitmq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server