delete-parameter
Delete a parameter for a specified component in a vhost on RabbitMQ.
Instructions
Delete a parameter for a component in a vhost.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| component | Yes | ||
| vhost | Yes | ||
| name | Yes |
Delete a parameter for a specified component in a vhost on RabbitMQ.
Delete a parameter for a component in a vhost.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| component | Yes | ||
| vhost | Yes | ||
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description confirms the destructive nature (delete) consistent with readOnlyHint=false. However, it adds no additional behavioral traits beyond annotations, such as potential side effects or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words, efficiently conveying the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation, the description is minimally adequate but does not cover return behavior, prerequisites (e.g., existence of parameter), or permanence of deletion. It leaves gaps that may confuse agents.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description only implicitly references 'component' and 'vhost' but does not explain their meaning or the 'name' parameter, failing to compensate for the lack of schema details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a parameter for a component in a vhost' clearly states the action (delete), the resource (parameter), and the context (component and vhost), distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete-global-parameter.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as put-parameter or get-parameter. The description lacks any context about prerequisites or selection criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kmitchell/rabbitmq-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server