set_price_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: it explicitly states that the tool will ask for user confirmation before execution. Annotations include idempotentHint=true, which is not contradicted. The description enhances transparency about the interaction flow.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences. It front-loads the primary action and includes crucial details (user confirmation, conditions). Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (5 params, 3 required) and lack of output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: purpose, conditions, and user confirmation. It could mention the outcome after confirmation, but it's implied. Adequate for context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaning by explaining the condition parameter (above/below) but does not elaborate on other parameters. It adds value without being redundant.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: setting a stock price alert (設定股價提醒). It specifies the verb (set) and resource (price alert), and distinguishes from siblings like cancel_alert or list_alerts. The inclusion of conditions (above/below) adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use the tool (to set a price alert with conditions). It does not explicitly exclude alternatives, but the purpose is straightforward given the tool name and sibling context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.