get_us_stock_quote
Retrieve current US stock quotes for multiple tickers at once by entering symbols separated by commas.
Instructions
取得美股即時報價,可同時查詢多檔
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbols | Yes | 美股代號(逗號分隔),例如 AAPL,NVDA,TSLA |
Retrieve current US stock quotes for multiple tickers at once by entering symbols separated by commas.
取得美股即時報價,可同時查詢多檔
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbols | Yes | 美股代號(逗號分隔),例如 AAPL,NVDA,TSLA |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare read-only, non-destructive, idempotent. Description adds 'real-time' and 'multiple' context, which is helpful. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise single sentence that front-loads the main action (getting real-time quotes) and capability (batch query). No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, but could mention what the response contains (e.g., price, volume) to improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the only parameter. The tool description only implies batch usage, not adding much beyond the schema, so baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it gets US stock real-time quotes and can query multiple stocks at once. This distinguishes it from siblings like get_stock_price which may not be real-time or batch.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_stock_price or get_full_stock_analysis. It does not mention exclusions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kevinlin49361128-stack/stock-analyzer-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server