get_evaluation_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Return the latest evaluation metrics', implying a read operation, but fails to mention if it triggers computation, requires prerequisites, or any side effects. The lack of details is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, making it concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It front-loads the purpose but is too brief to be informative. It could be longer to include parameter context or usage hints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no annotations, an output schema (unseen), and 33 sibling tools, the description is extremely incomplete. It fails to clarify what evaluation metrics are, how the 'latest' is determined, and how this tool relates to siblings like 'compute_evaluation_metrics'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one optional parameter 'token' with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the parameter's purpose, format, or when to provide it. Since schema coverage is low, the description should compensate but does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Return the latest evaluation metrics', which is a clear verb and resource. However, it's vague about what 'evaluation metrics' refers to and doesn't distinguish from sibling tools like 'compute_evaluation_metrics', making it difficult to know if this returns stored or computed metrics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'compute_evaluation_metrics' or 'get_compound'. The description implies a read operation but offers no context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.