Skip to main content
Glama
kettly1260
by kettly1260

Related Servers

Alternatives to scifinder-route-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Ketcher chemical structure editor integration, enabling SMILES/MOL/InChI conversion, image generation, molecular property calculation, and validation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables local hybrid semantic and keyword search over private PDF, DOCX, Markdown, and text documents without sending data to embedding APIs.
      9
      3,151 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for hybrid documentation search (keyword + vector) and RAG chat, enabling natural language queries with cited answers from indexed repositories.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first RAG indexing and semantic search MCP server. Enables document retrieval and context-aware queries using local embedding models.
      3
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that searches multiple scholarly metadata providers (PubMed, Europe PMC, bioRxiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv), deduplicates results, and returns ranked literature with optional open-access full-text retrieval from Europe PMC.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a specific, well-defined purpose. Document ingestion, compound/reaction searching, evaluation, and config/health tools are clearly separated without overlap. An agent can easily distinguish between e.g., search_compounds and search_by_smiles, or between list_parse_jobs and get_parse_job_status.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., backup_database, get_compound, search_reaction_steps). There is no mixing of cases or inconsistent verb forms, making the naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 32 tools, the set is too large for typical MCP server coherence. While the domain is complex, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple get_ and search_ tools). The count exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many' and may overwhelm agents.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: document ingestion, parsing, compound/reaction search, evaluation, config management, and maintenance. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit delete for documents or compounds), but core workflows are well-supported and no dead ends are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues