settle_dr_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits. It does not indicate that this is a destructive or irreversible action, whether special permissions are required, or what side effects occur (e.g., updating event status, generating certificates).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could benefit from slightly more context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and minimal description, the tool's behavior is under-explained. The term 'settle' and 'carbon attestation' are ambiguous, leaving the agent unsure of the exact outcome or process. Sibling tools like generate_settlement suggest settlement may involve reporting, but this is not clarified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter event_id, which is labeled 'Event UUID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Settle' and the resource 'DR event' with the qualifier 'with carbon attestation', distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_dr_event, dispatch_dr_event, or get_dr_event.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., dispatch_dr_event or generate_settlement). There is no mention of prerequisites, such as the DR event being dispatched or an attestation already being obtained.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.