dispatch_dr_event
Dispatch a demand response event by providing its event UUID to activate energy load reduction.
Instructions
Execute dispatch for a DR event
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| event_id | Yes | Event UUID |
Dispatch a demand response event by providing its event UUID to activate energy load reduction.
Execute dispatch for a DR event
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| event_id | Yes | Event UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only says 'Execute dispatch'. It does not disclose side effects, permissions, rate limits, or what happens during dispatch. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise phrase, front-loading the action. However, it may be overly terse but remains efficient with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given only one simple parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It lacks context about what dispatch entails, return values, or integration with other tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter event_id with description 'Event UUID'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Per guidelines, baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Execute dispatch for a DR event' clearly states the action (execute dispatch) and the resource (DR event). It distinguishes from siblings like dispatch_command and settle_dr_event, but does not explicitly differentiate from similar tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dispatch_command or settle_dr_event. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kasathur/energyatit-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server