EnergyAtIt MCP Server

create_carbon_record

Creates a carbon attestation record in the hash chain using energy consumption data (meter ID, facility, timestamp, kWh) for verifiable carbon tracking.

Instructions

Create a carbon attestation record in the hash chain

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "meter_id": "<meter_id>",
      "facility_id": "<facility_id>",
      "timestamp": "<timestamp>",
      "kwh": "<kwh>"
    },
    "name": "create_carbon_record"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`meter_id`	Yes	Meter ID
`facility_id`	Yes	Facility UUID
`timestamp`	Yes	ISO timestamp
`kwh`	Yes	Energy in kWh
`grid_zone`	No	Grid zone

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv1.0.0May 29, 2026

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic operation. It does not disclose side effects, authentication needs, return behavior, or whether records are appended or overwritten.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the core action and resource, with no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite good schema coverage, the description lacks completeness for an agent: no output schema, no error conditions, and no context on how this tool relates to other carbon tools or procurement workflows.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema; it only reiterates the tool's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('carbon attestation record in the hash chain'), providing a specific verb+resource combination. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_carbon_attestation or verify_carbon_chain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_procurement or create_dr_event. The description does not provide context for appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.