Skip to main content
Glama
karbassi

loom-mcp

by karbassi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to loom-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-graphql-schema

      hannesj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A MCP server that exposes GraphQL schema information to LLMs like Claude. This server allows an LLM to explore and understand large GraphQL schemas through a set of specialized tools, without needing to load the whole schema into the context
      54 npm
      47
      MIT

    • awesome-mineflayer-mcp

      G0Osey99
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that gives an LLM agent standalone-equivalent control over a Mineflayer Minecraft bot — movement, mining, crafting, inventory, combat, containers, chat, and much more — exposed as 110 strongly-typed tools across 23 groups, with full bot lifecycle management and dual (poll + push) event streaming.
      50 npm
      2
      MIT

    • unraid-code-mode-mcp

      jmpijll
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A code-mode MCP server for the Unraid 7.2+ GraphQL API that exposes search and execute tools, allowing LLM agents to introspect and call any GraphQL field via sandboxed JavaScript.
      2
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 60 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct aspects of Loom videos (reactions, comments, tasks, folders, etc.), and descriptions clarify differences. However, there is potential confusion between similar tools like add_comment_reaction vs add_reaction, and multiple get_* tools for video details (e.g., get_description, get_summary, get_key_takeaways) require careful reading to differentiate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_comment, delete_video, get_transcript) with underscores throughout. Verbs like get, list, search, create, delete, update, archive, rename are used predictably, making the tool set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 60 tools, the count is excessively high for a typical MCP server. While the domain is rich, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple get_* variants for video details). The sheer number overwhelms agents and makes selection harder than necessary.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers nearly all aspects of video management: CRUD for videos, comments, tasks, folders, spaces, reactions, watch later, pinning, archiving, recovering, duplicating, sharing, and more. It also includes advanced features like backlinks, Confluence integration, and caption retrieval. No obvious gaps for the intended purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources