Skip to main content
Glama
kanjidoc
by kanjidoc

missive_create_post

Destructive

Create a post in a Missive conversation to inject content and manage conversation state such as closing, reopening, assigning users, and adding labels.

Instructions

Creates a post in a Missive conversation (POST /posts). A post is the recommended way for an automation to inject content and manage conversation state (close/reopen, move to inbox, assign users, add labels, set color) while leaving a visible trace. WARNING: the post is PERMANENT and VISIBLE to everyone with access to the conversation, creating it can send NOTIFICATIONS to those people, and it CANNOT be undone through this server (no delete tool is exposed). At least one of text, markdown, or attachments is required. If no conversation or matching references is given, a new conversation is created.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
teamNoTeam ID to link the conversation to. Required when add_to_team_inbox is true.
textNoMain message of the post as plain text (max 8000 chars). At least one of text, markdown, or attachments is required.
closeNoIf true, close the conversation for everyone with access.
reopenNoIf true, keep a closed conversation closed even after adding this post (prevents auto-reopen).
markdownNoMain message of the post formatted with Markdown (max 8000 chars). At least one of text, markdown, or attachments is required.
usernameNoName of the post author, used instead of the API token owner's name.
add_usersNoUser IDs to grant access to the conversation. Requires `organization`.
force_teamNoIf true, move the conversation to `team` even if it is already in another team.
referencesNoReference strings (e.g. email Message-ID values) used to append the post to an existing conversation; chevrons are optional. If none match, a new conversation is created.
attachmentsNoArray of attachment objects: either formatted blocks (color/title/text/fields/etc.) or binary file attachments ({ base64_data, filename }). At least one of text, markdown, or attachments is required.
add_to_inboxNoIf true, move the conversation to Inbox (unarchive) for everyone with access.
conversationNoID of an existing conversation to append this post to. If omitted (and no matching references), a new conversation is created.
notificationNoOptional notification object with `title` and `body`, used to render the notification shown to recipients.
organizationNoOrganization ID. Required when using add_users, add_assignees, or remove_assignees. Also scopes conversation search and links a newly created conversation to the organization.
add_assigneesNoUser IDs to assign to the conversation (existing assignees remain). Requires `organization`.
username_iconNoImage URL of the post author, used instead of the API token owner's avatar.
remove_assigneesNoUser IDs to unassign from the conversation. Requires `organization`.
add_shared_labelsNoShared label IDs to apply to the post's conversation.
add_to_team_inboxNoIf true, move the conversation to a team inbox for everyone with access. Requires `team`.
conversation_iconNoImage URL used as the icon in the conversation list.
conversation_colorNoConversation color: a HEX code (e.g. "#000") or one of "good", "warning", "danger".
conversation_subjectNoSubject for the conversation, e.g. "New user!".
remove_shared_labelsNoShared label IDs to remove from the post's conversation.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the destructiveHint annotation, the description details that posts are permanent, visible to all, send notifications, cannot be undone (no delete tool), and can create new conversations. This provides critical behavioral context beyond the binary flag.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, starting with the core purpose, followed by the warning and requirement, all in short, clear sentences. Every sentence adds necessary information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 23 parameters, no output schema, and side effects like permanence and notifications, the description covers key behavioral aspects, constraints, and creation logic. It is complete for an agent to understand the tool's impact and requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds a summary of the text/markdown/attachments requirement and conditional new conversation creation, but does not significantly enrich individual parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a post in a Missive conversation, uses specific verbs like 'inject content and manage conversation state', and distinguishes itself from sibling creation tools by emphasizing its role as the recommended automation method for state changes while leaving a visible trace. The warning about permanence further clarifies its unique purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use this tool ('recommended way for automation to inject content and manage conversation state') and warns about permanence and notifications, implying avoidance for reversible actions. It also states that missing conversation/references creates a new conversation. However, it does not name specific alternative tools for reversible cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kanjidoc/missive-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server