suggest_compression_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the purpose and role values but does not mention whether the tool is read-only, what side effects it has, or any required permissions. The output schema is present but the description does not address behavioral aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: two sentences clearly stating the purpose and listing role options. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (via context signals), the description is largely complete for a simple suggestion tool. It defines the input role values and purpose. It could briefly hint at what the output contains, but the schema handles that. Minor gap: no mention of prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds value for the 'role' parameter by listing possible values, but provides no detail for 'track_index'. This is partially helpful but leaves a gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides compressor settings suggestions for a track based on its role. It uses a specific verb ('suggest') and resource ('compressor settings'), and the role parameter distinguishes it from sibling tools like suggest_eq_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists possible role values ('kick', 'snare', 'bass', 'vocal', 'bus', 'glue', 'limiting', 'auto'), implying when to use the tool (e.g., for specific track types). However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.