get_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It correctly indicates a read-only operation but does not disclose additional behavioral traits like scope (session clip only?), required permissions, or side effects. The mention of loop settings and warp mode adds some context but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with main action. Efficient and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values need not be described. Description covers essential purpose and specific details. However, it could clarify that the clip is from a session slot (implied by parameters) vs arrangement, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but parameter names (track_index, slot_index) are self-explanatory from titles. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, such as explaining that these identify a clip in a track's slot. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool retrieves detailed info about a clip, specifically loop settings and warp mode. Verb 'get' and resource 'clip' are explicit, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like list_clips (lists clips without details) or delete_clip (deletes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage context (inspecting clip details) but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., use list_clips first to find indices, or use get_clip before modifying). No when-not or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.