mute_drum_pad

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It clearly states the action (mute/unmute), which is straightforward. However, it does not disclose any side effects, prerequisites, or additional behavioral traits beyond the toggle action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource. No unnecessary words or information. Highly concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite being a simple toggle, the description omits important context about what 'track_index' and 'device_index' refer to (track with drum rack, device index). Without this, the agent may misinterpret how to target the correct drum pad. The existence of an output schema does not compensate for missing parameter context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning for the 'note' parameter by specifying 'by MIDI note number', but does not clarify the roles of 'track_index' or 'device_index'. This leaves significant gaps for an AI agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Mute or unmute') and resource ('a specific drum pad'), and identifies the key identifier ('by MIDI note number'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like mute_chain and get_drum_pad.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like mute_chain or when not to use it. The description implies usage for muting/unmuting drum pads but lacks explicit context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.