Skip to main content
Glama
jshsakura

mfa-servicenow-mcp

by jshsakura

export_record_xml

Export selected records as importable XML files to a specified directory or exact file path.

Instructions

Export records as importable XML to disk (current sys_update_version). Read saved_path.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
namesNoAdvanced: raw <table>_<sys_id> names, for a cross-table file.
tableNo
sys_idsNosys_ids to export. Combined with table into update names.
output_dirNoSave dir (auto filename). Default: ./temp/<instance>/xml/
output_pathNoExact .xml file to write. Overrides output_dir.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions writing to disk and hints at a saved path but does not explain whether files are overwritten, required permissions, or the side effects of the export. The safety profile remains opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, minimal waste. However, the structure could be improved to separate parameter advice from general behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description should clarify return values or expected output. It only says 'Read saved_path' without elaboration. For a tool with 5 parameters and potential side effects, the description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 80% (4 of 5 parameters described in schema). The description adds 'Read saved_path' which may refer to output_path, but no additional semantic detail beyond the schema is provided. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool exports records as importable XML to disk, referencing 'current sys_update_version' and 'Read saved_path.' The verb 'Export' and resource 'records as XML' are specific, but no differentiation from sibling tools is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, preferred use cases, or conditions that disfavor it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jshsakura/mfa-servicenow-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server