Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to YouTube Channel MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to control a YouTube channel through MCP, including uploading and editing videos, scheduling releases, and reading channel and video analytics via official APIs.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to access their own YouTube channel, videos, and analytics through MCP-compatible clients such as ChatGPT and Claude, exposing tools for channel stats, video listing, video analytics, and video search.
      15 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage multiple named YouTube accounts through one local stdio server, covering video upload and scheduling, metadata, captions, playlists, comments, live broadcasts and chat, channel branding, and analytics reporting via the official Google APIs. It also offers optional FFmpeg-based local media tools for probing, muxing audio, normalizing loudness, trimming, burning subtitles, and extracting thumbnails.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely organized by resource+action (video, playlist, caption, comment, channel, template), and descriptions draw the few delicate boundaries explicitly (delete_comment only deletes the channel's own comments; others go through moderate_comments). The main soft overlaps are set_visibility vs update_video's visibility field and moderate_comments' remove vs delete_comment, but both are spelled out. An agent can pick correctly with modest care.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly everything follows a verb_noun pattern (upload_video, list_playlists, move_in_playlist, moderate_comments, set_thumbnail). The only deviations are noun-only status tools (auth_status, quota_status), which read fine in context. No mixed casing or style chaos.

    Tool Count2/5

    46 tools is far beyond a comfortable working set for a single server, even one covering this many sub-domains (uploads, videos, playlists, captions, comments, channel branding, analytics, templates, auth, quota). Several thin tools (auth_status, quota_status, list_uploads) could be folded into broader resources. The surface is heavy enough that discovery itself becomes a burden.

    Completeness5/5

    The lifecycle is covered end to end: video and playlist CRUD plus item reordering, caption upload/download/delete, channel profile and branding, comment listing/reply/moderation/deletion, analytics reports, background upload jobs with cancel/resume, and metadata templates. Even operational concerns (quota, auth health, confirmation rules, previews) are represented, leaving no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues