get_user
Look up a PocketSmith user by their unique ID to retrieve profile details and account information.
Instructions
Get a PocketSmith user by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The user ID |
Look up a PocketSmith user by their unique ID to retrieve profile details and account information.
Get a PocketSmith user by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The user ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are available, so the description is responsible for disclosing behavior. It only states the action and does not mention permissions, return format, or error handling, which leaves the agent with incomplete information for a potentially meaningful operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence that front-loads the verb and object. It contains no unnecessary words and is easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the essential information. It could be slightly more complete by mentioning the return value or typical usage context, but it is sufficient for the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already fully describes the 'id' parameter at 100% coverage. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'PocketSmith user by ID', which precisely defines the action and distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_me that retrieve the current user without an ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_me. It does not mention any context, exclusions, or preferred scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/joeswann/pocketsmith-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server