gmb_qanda_locations_questions_patch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the read-only and destructive hints. The description adds valuable context beyond annotations by stating that the operation is deprecated and that only questions written by the current user can be updated, which clarifies authorization scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with the deprecated status front-loaded. It contains no redundant or filler text, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich schema and annotations, the description is adequate but does not mention the requirement for updateMask or that only question text can be updated. These details are present in the schema, so the description is not severely incomplete, but it leaves some context implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the input schema thoroughly documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning or context about the parameters, so it does not exceed the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Updates' and the resource 'specific question written by the current user'. It distinguishes this patch operation from sibling tools like create, list, and delete by specifying the update action and the user scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that this should be used for updating existing questions rather than creating new ones, nor does it suggest an alternative given its deprecated status.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.