gmb_accounts_locations_admins_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and idempotentHint=true. The description adds the fact that it removes an admin from a location, which is consistent. It does not enrich behavioral understanding beyond the annotations (e.g., no mention of permissions, reversibility, or side effects).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the HTTP method and action. Every word contributes to understanding, with no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with good annotations, the description is adequate. It does not mention return values or error conditions, but given the lack of output schema and the simplicity of the operation, it is reasonably complete. Slightly more detail on behavior (e.g., idempotency) could improve it, but annotations fill that gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, as it does not elaborate on parameter formats or relationships. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Removes'), the resource ('admin'), and the scope ('from the specified location'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like gmb_accounts_locations_admins_create and gmb_accounts_locations_admins_patch by specifying the delete operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (when you need to remove an admin from a location) but provides no explicit when-to-use or alternatives. It does not mention exclusions or relationships to other admin operations, so it falls short of clear context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.