gmb_qanda_locations_questions_answers_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a safe, idempotent, read-only operation. The description adds useful non-obvious behavior: pagination ('paginated list') and deprecation status ('[DEPRECATED]'). It does not contradict annotations. This goes beyond what annotations provide, earning a 4.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that immediately signals deprecation, then states the HTTP verb, endpoint, and core behavior. No wasted words; every element earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list operation with full schema coverage and strong annotations, the description is nearly complete. It covers the return type ('paginated list') and required parent context. The only gap is that deprecation is announced without an alternative, reducing completeness slightly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully documents all 8 parameters with descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description does not add parameter details, but the schema already carries that burden. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description provides no additional semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Returns the paginated list of answers for a specified question.' It uses a specific verb ('Returns'), identifies the resource ('answers'), and scopes it to a question via the 'parent' parameter. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like question list or answer create/delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for fetching answers to a specific question, but it does not explicitly discuss when to use this tool versus alternatives. The [DEPRECATED] tag signals it should likely not be used, yet no replacement tool is mentioned, leaving the agent without clear guidance on alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.