jdocmunch_guide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. It states the tool is idempotent and requires no repo context, which are key behavioral traits. It does not mention authentication or output details, but for a simple retrieval tool this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences plus a sibling note, all front-loaded. Every sentence adds value: the first defines the action, the second explains the benefit. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description provides sufficient information for a simple retrieval tool. It covers purpose, behavior, and context. Minor gaps: no specification of output format, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so schema description coverage is 100%. The description adds value by explaining what the tool returns and why it is useful. With no parameters, a baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Return' and the specific resource 'version-current CLAUDE.md / AGENT.md policy snippet for jdocmunch-mcp'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool jcodemunch_guide and explains the purpose: allowing agents to keep a one-line instruction instead of a stale snippet.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the use case: replacing a static snippet to avoid drift. It also notes idempotency and no repo context needed. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or list alternatives beyond the sibling mention.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.