Skip to main content
Glama

get_session_stats

Monitors session performance by returning latency per tool and total tokens saved, helping assess token efficiency.

Instructions

Session self-monitor: returns {latency_per_tool, total_tokens_saved}. Lightweight; reads the in-memory latency ring + persistent savings counter. For windowed analysis use analyze_perf.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses it reads in-memory ring and persistent counter, implying read-only and lightweight, with no side effects. No annotations to contradict.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load purpose and include guidance; no superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Returns specific fields, but could elaborate on structure of latency_per_tool (e.g., map from tool to latency). Still adequate for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters; description adds value by explaining returned fields, but baseline is high due to zero parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns {latency_per_tool, total_tokens_saved} and distinguishes from sibling analyze_perf by specifying it is for windowed analysis.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly describes when to use (lightweight snapshot) and directs to analyze_perf for windowed analysis, providing clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jgravelle/jdocmunch-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server