Skip to main content
Glama
jeongho54

loadbench-mcp

by jeongho54

Related Servers

Alternatives to loadbench-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives an AI assistant a set of real mechanical-engineering tools. Provides deterministic tools like material properties, beam analysis, unit conversion, and curve fitting for engineering calculations.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for construction tools that calculates wall formwork material takeoffs from geometry inputs, enabling LLMs to generate accurate bills of materials.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes CAD geometry reasoning over STEP files to LLMs, allowing natural language queries about parts, assemblies, dimensions, holes, and mass properties.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to build physically valid Lego models by enforcing catalog-only parts, no overlaps, stud-to-tube connections, and other real-world constraints.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that turns any AI assistant into a powerful mathematical computation engine, providing 52 advanced functions, 158 unit conversions, financial calculations, and secure AST-based evaluation.
      18
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing over 30 mathematical and statistical tools, enabling language models to perform calculations, trigonometry, statistics, combinatorics, and list operations through natural language.
      9 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct structural analysis task: beam bending, tipping stability, and support reactions. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_tipping, solve_supports) while one is noun_verb (beam_check). The naming is clear and readable, but the slight inconsistency prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools provide a focused set for basic structural analysis, covering beam checks, tipping, and support reactions. The count is appropriate for the domain without being too sparse or overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core structural analysis needs for simple loads and supports. Missing features like shear checks or multiple load combinations are minor gaps, but the set is functional for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues