Skip to main content
Glama

regulatory-radar__assess_compliance

Assess a company's regulatory compliance posture (CSRD/TNFD). Returns compliance level, percentage, gaps, and prioritised remediation steps.

Instructions

[regulatory-radar — CSRD/TNFD compliance-as-a-service] Assess a company's compliance posture against applicable regulations.

Returns compliance level, percentage, gaps, and remediation priorities.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sectorYes
disclosuresNo
payment_refNo
company_nameYes
jurisdictionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed12 schema fields changedv0.1.11
    • addedInput schema / properties / company_name / title
      Added value: +"Company Name"
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / default
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / title
      Added value: +"Disclosures"
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / type
      Removed value: -"array"
    • addedInput schema / properties / jurisdiction / title
      Added value: +"Jurisdiction"
    • addedInput schema / properties / payment_ref / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / payment_ref / default
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / payment_ref / title
      Added value: +"Payment Ref"
    • removedInput schema / properties / payment_ref / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / sector / title
      Added value: +"Sector"
    • addedInput schema / title
      Added value: +"assess_complianceArguments"
  2. Changed9 schema fields changedv0.1.9
    • removedInput schema / properties / company_name / title
      Removed value: -"Company Name"
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / default
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / title
      Removed value: -"Disclosures"
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / type
      Added value: +"array"
    • removedInput schema / properties / jurisdiction / title
      Removed value: -"Jurisdiction"
    • addedInput schema / properties / payment_ref
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedInput schema / properties / sector / title
      Removed value: -"Sector"
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"assess_complianceArguments"
  3. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / company_name / title
      Added value: +"Company Name"
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / default
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / title
      Added value: +"Disclosures"
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / type
      Removed value: -"array"
    • addedInput schema / properties / jurisdiction / title
      Added value: +"Jurisdiction"
    • addedInput schema / properties / sector / title
      Added value: +"Sector"
    • addedInput schema / title
      Added value: +"assess_complianceArguments"
  4. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / company_name / title
      Removed value: -"Company Name"
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / default
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / disclosures / title
      Removed value: -"Disclosures"
    • addedInput schema / properties / disclosures / type
      Added value: +"array"
    • removedInput schema / properties / jurisdiction / title
      Removed value: -"Jurisdiction"
    • removedInput schema / properties / sector / title
      Removed value: -"Sector"
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"assess_complianceArguments"
  5. First observed

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the return format (compliance level, percentage, gaps, remediation priorities) but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether it creates records), authentication needs, rate limits, or cost implications. The 'payment_ref' parameter hints at potentially transactional behavior, but this is not addressed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes an unnecessary bracketed prefix 'regulatory-radar — CSRD/TNFD compliance-as-a-service' that could be integrated more naturally. The second sentence lists return items efficiently, but the overall structure could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite 5 parameters and no output schema, the description only partially clarifies return values. Missing context includes which regulations are applied, how 'company_name' is resolved, and the role of 'payment_ref' (suggests payment requirement). The tool's complexity demands more detail for adequate agent understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameter. Required parameters (company_name, sector, jurisdiction) and optional ones (disclosures, payment_ref) are listed in the schema but lack semantic context such as format, allowed values, or usage examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool assesses a company's compliance posture against applicable regulations, with a specific verb ('assess') and resource ('compliance'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like `regulatory-radar__monitor_changes` and `regulatory-radar__scan_regulations` by focusing on assessment rather than monitoring or scanning.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like `scan_regulations` or `monitor_changes`. The description does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or scenarios where another tool would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools