compute-ledger__verify_attestation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the verification method (recomputing hash), giving insight into behavior. However, with no annotations, it fails to disclose side effects, required permissions, or error conditions. Provides partial transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise—one sentence that includes a domain tag. It gets straight to the point with minimal waste, though the tag could be seen as extraneous.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (one unstructured parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is too sparse. It lacks details on input format, output, error handling, and sibling differentiation, leaving significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not address the single parameter 'attestation'. With 0% schema description coverage, the tool needs to compensate but fails to clarify what constitutes a valid attestation object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Verify an attestation by recomputing the entry hash.' It includes a domain tag that aids context. However, it does not differentiate from similarly named sibling tools like erc8004__verify_attestation or trust__verify_attestation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or contextual hints. The description lacks explicit usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.