quantity-takeoff__verify_result

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; the description does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, has side effects, requires specific permissions, or what the output format is. Only implicit that it recomputes values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with essential information and domain context; no unnecessary content. Front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing output description; given no output schema, the description should explain what the tool returns after recomputation. Adequate for a simple 1-param tool but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter result_json has no schema description; the description only states to pass the prior result object as JSON, lacking structure or format details. This adds some value but insufficient for 0% coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool recomputes a takeoff audit hash, notary payload, pack currency, and QT9 unit-resolved conservation, which is a specific verification action distinct from other quantity-takeoff tools like calculate_takeoff.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this verification tool versus alternative takeoff tools or other verify tools. The description does not provide context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.