Skip to main content
Glama
jbdamask

NIH RePORTER MCP

by jbdamask

Related Servers

Alternatives to NIH RePORTER MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables advanced PubMed literature search, citation formatting, and research analysis through natural language interactions.
      12
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evidence-grounded biomedical retrieval and summarization through the Model Context Protocol, enabling queries for biomedical evidence with citation-backed results.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enhances language models with protein structure analysis capabilities, enabling detailed active site analysis and disease-related protein searches through established protein databases.
      2
      19
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A specialized Model Context Protocol server that enhances AI-assisted medical learning by connecting Claude Desktop to PubMed, NCBI Bookshelf, and user documents for searching, retrieving, and analyzing medical education content.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching research grants across NSF (US), ERC (EU), and KRF/NRF (Korea) via a unified interface. NIH excluded—covered by existing connectors.
      3
      9 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The three search tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. search_combined appears to combine projects and publications, while search_projects and search_publications handle them separately. An agent might struggle to choose between search_combined and the other two for certain queries, though the descriptions provide some guidance about their different focuses.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case. search_combined, search_projects, search_publications, and test_connection all use clear, predictable naming conventions that make the tool set easy to understand at a glance.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is reasonable for an NIH RePORTER interface, though it feels slightly thin. The three search operations and one connection test cover the core functionality, but additional tools for retrieving specific projects or publications by ID might have made the surface more complete. The count isn't problematic, just minimal.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set provides search capabilities but lacks obvious retrieval operations. There's no way to get a specific project or publication by identifier (like project number or PMID), which creates a gap in the CRUD lifecycle. Agents can work around this by searching with specific criteria, but direct lookup tools would make the surface more complete for the NIH RePORTER domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues